Ironosaur 2009-01-21 22:20:45

Alright. Wonderful. I'd just like to argue about you calling me a dumbass in response to my review on your flash.

You never mentioned whether or not it was an official release. Therefore, you're wrong. it was initially released with Flash 9 Public Alpha. You're just angry because you never mentioned official full version release.

The public Alpha offered more than half of what Flash CS3 is now. Only major bugs were fixed from 9A to CS3. So while technically it could be considered a release, it is actually a re-release, or you can consider it an update to the prior release. Since you never mentioned the official release part, it can go either way.

You then said that the cursor effect "WAS WROTE WITH AS3 ON MY FLASH!!!!!!!!!"
Okay, you're just getting a little hyped up. I never said that you didn't, if you actually bothered to read my review and not skim. your sheer anger at my politely stated review confounds me. Continuing on, that's not even proper grammar, so please remind me again, why are you calling ME a dumbass?

I will agree that the ability to put code directly on button instances was dropped, but not by adobe. it was dropped by Macromedia with the release of Flash 9A. Take into consideration that, as well. Also, it was not never entirely dropped. You simply put the code in from a different perspective, the time line. You're still applying code directly to the button. It was not entirely dropped as well. Using older flash player versions, you still have access to the ability of placing code directly on button instances. You said Adobe dropped it? Wrong. Macromedia did. Did they entirely drop it? No. Only for certain usages.

I understand that you wrote the code with AS3. I was implying that the effect could be done, EVEN WITH THE SIMPLEST VERSIONS OF FLASH. I used to use Flash 4, and that was possible back then.

While you may have used Flash CS3, you never truly embraced the new possibilities of the code.

You're over-reacting to my review. You got angry because I politely tried to correct you? Do you have anger management issues? I only left a review. This is Newgrounds, not Deviantart. getting a negative review is nothing to fret about, but what I really don't understand is why you incorrectly stated more "facts," used horrible grammar, and yet still managed to call me the idiot.

Would you care to correct yourself?

Ironosaur 2009-01-27 19:38:15

Are you a bad enough dude to respond to my comments, or are you too scared? Or did you just leave altogether? I've noticed that you haven't responded to my previous comments, so I'm going to go with the assumption that you're scared. If you really took shit seriously, you'd probably want to fix your quiz again, because you just made yourself look like a stupid, insecure, hypoglycemic little troll in my negative review to your pointless, crappy flash, which didn't tech people shit, if that was what you were aiming for. It lacked no entertainment value, and it was not funny.

Another thing that I noticed is how bad your art is. It appears that your top banner contains 4 horribly drawn tiny little stick figures, the basic element of a noobish flash regime. One of them is holding a right angle, which I'm going to infer is a gun, who just shot a levitating pink stick figure.

I'm going to reeturn to the issue about how you have negatively responded to my review. The response lacked proper grammar, didn't address any of the issues I had pointed out. You made yourself look dumber in that review than you did in the entire flash. You made yourself look like a spastic, insecure, idiot who copied the code from someone else, and claimed to have written it yourself.

I can tell because of how horrible the presentation was. you obviously spent no more than a few minutes working on that entire thing.

You show no proof that you can actually use AS3 to it's full potential. Until you make another flash, this time not a quiz or tutorial, but an actual interactive flash and prove that you have used AS3 and not AS2, I don't think any distinguished user will believe that you don't know any more AS3 than the simple crap you put in that quiz. I only say one usage of actual code in the entire thing.

Then I told you how you could improve, but you still bashed me.

You are a hypocrite.
You are a stupid, motherfucking, insecure, hypoglycemic little hypocrite, and I will take back insecure when you respond.

Ironosaur 2009-01-29 17:19:10

Okay. I look even further into this little conundrum. Now in a later review, you state: "Well, I wasn't totally interested in the project anyways..."

So what does this mean?

You completely flipped out at my review, and then you later claim that you didn't even care?
Again, you're calling me the dumbass?

This only makes you look like a more pathetic, glee-fueled moron.